The Divine Revolution of Catastrophe demands a condition of cosmic solitude from those devoted to it. The revolutionary is indeed ambitious, but that ambition is metaphysical in nature and possesses no worldly dimension. The worldly is profane, just as everything that was once sacred becomes profane once it has fallen from its original condition. The Revolution does not seek to restore the sacred. It will not attempt the re-sacralization of that which was once holy and has since become profaned.
Let us take the institution of the family as an example. The mere fact that someone possesses a family already provides sufficient reason not to place revolutionary power in their hands, for the family has long since become a profaned institution. From the perspective of the Revolution, the family has become an incubator of profanation and primitivism. Parasitic social power is transmitted from generation to generation through inheritance. Families establish clans and cliques, and these in turn create nomenklaturas.
Let me be clear. I am not advocating the destruction of the family as an institution. That is not the intention of the Revolution. What I advocate is the destruction of families of power, those hereditary blood-clans that have transformed the family into an instrument for transmitting privilege and control, as well as for reproducing particular forms of psychological and occult pathology. The family as a community of love is sacred. The family as an instrument of power is accursed. Once, the families that carried social power were themselves sacred. They possessed not only political authority but magical, sacred authority as well. These were the holy royal houses.
Today, there is no family line remaining that bears an authentic aura of sacrality. In an age of universal primitivism, profanity, and vulgarity, humanity continues to be ruled by equally primitive family dynasties that may once have possessed a noble lineage but have long since degenerated and fallen under Qliphothic influence. Some of them may indeed descend from exalted, noble, and initiated ancestors. Yet through decadence, the loss or neglect of initiatory formulas of inheritance, and the dilution of bloodlines, they have become no better than the masses they govern. The only things they still possess are method, leverage, and secret initiation. What remains to them is the instinct of preserving the family line. Yet beyond the preservation and expansion of power, this instinct has lost every higher cosmic, religious, or ethical meaning.
Thus humanity has gradually arrived at what I would call the end of culture. Just as non-being decomposes being, so anti-culture decomposes culture. Primitive people will, quite naturally and in accordance with their primitivism, seek to transmit accumulated power and wealth to their descendants. The hereditary transmission of property and power is one of the fundamental preconditions for the continuation of history.
The end of history, toward which the revolutionaries of catastrophe strive, seeks to bring that process to a permanent conclusion. The continuity of the vulgar and profane bloodline is the essential enemy of the end of history envisioned by the Revolution, and of historical vulgar humanity itself. From this follows a radical conclusion: those family lines must be broken, their power shattered, and their wealth confiscated. No form of power must remain in their possession.
I am fully aware of how these words sound, especially since the family is traditionally regarded, in classical social doctrines, as the basic cell of society. Such is indeed the case within historical humanity, where we encounter a fourfold relationship:
The individual
The family
The community (the people)
Humanity
These are the four cornerstones of the symbolic historical human dwelling, and they possess their own esoteric and macrocosmic correspondences.
The individual is the Sun rising in the East, corresponding to the sign of Taurus, the first and foundational principle. The family is the powerful Sun elevated high in the South, corresponding to Leo, the consequence of the mutual “knowing” of man and woman, the goal of their union and the result of partaking of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge. The community, whether tribe, people, or later nation, reflects the nature of Scorpio. It demands sacrifice, implies war and death, and therefore represents the red Sun at sunset. Finally, humanity is the dark sea through which the Sun travels in the underworld, corresponding to Aquarius.
Within this pattern we recognize the Four Archangels, the Four Stars, the Four Directions, and the Four Pillars of the human world. These are the pillars that the revolutionaries will shake, for their will is the will of the Spirit of the Age. The Age of Aquarius is the age of humanity as a whole. The central issues are no longer those of individuals, families, or nations, but those of human existence itself upon the Earth. The question is no longer the survival of a particular individual, lineage, tribe, nation, state, or empire. It is the survival of humanity as a whole.
The revolutionaries themselves are not important as individuals. What matters is the idea of the Divine Revolution of Catastrophe. Why divine? Because it is aligned with a purpose that proceeds from a higher order of reality and aims at the correction of disorder through revolution, whose principal expression is the catastrophe of the established disorder itself.
For many people, disorder is the only order they have ever known, and they will cling to it desperately and defend it at all costs. Those who will bear upon their shoulders the burden of the Divine Revolutionary intervention will appear, at first glance, as dehumanized beings. Yet they will be capable of accomplishing the Revolution because they are guided by a true will that rises from the deeper strata of their being.
The destruction of the enemies of the Revolution entails the erasure of every trace of their existence, including the elimination of their imprint within the Astral Light itself, so that no testimony remains that they ever existed. There is no initiation of defectors. We neither recognize nor respect that form of primitive mimicry. There is no acceptance of those who have grown in the shadow of primitivism and the selfishness of hereditary power.
The enemy of the Revolution is a complete enemy, not because of beliefs or social position, but because of what such a person is: because of ancestors, family name, tradition, and descendants, who, proud of their blood and lineage, will march into a future of clans, plutocracy, and oligarchy, convinced that they are elevated, chosen, and entitled simply because they possess ancestors. Anathema! For they are not merely political adversaries. They are ontological adversaries. Their existence is an insult to everything that is sacred.
At this point I should clarify a methodological issue. When I use the word enemy, understand it as an enemy of the Revolution as a process, not as an enemy carrying psychological weight within the mind of the revolutionary. The revolutionary has no enemies on a personal or emotional level. What is taking place here is extermination, not a holy war that constructs and nourishes an image of the Enemy. Such an approach is energetically inefficient. Rats and cockroaches are simply eradicated, without hatred or anger, coldly and impersonally. As when one redesigns a garden and removes weeds.
Perhaps someone reading this might conclude that I advocate the destruction of the family, oppose marriage, or reject emotional and sexual relationships between human beings. That is not the case. The family is not, in itself, an institution of primitivism or neo-primitivism. My criticism is directed toward the family as an institution of power whose binding force is neither love nor responsibility toward the maintenance of cosmic order, but rather the mindless confinement of subhuman passions, obsessions, inclinations, fears, and greed. Such a family is an agent of non-being. This does not mean that power should therefore belong to selfish and incompetent individuals who have emancipated themselves from family ties in the most miserable manner imaginable.
The future does not belong to humanity. Rather, the remnants of humanity will serve as the nucleus of a future transhumanist creation. A time is approaching when life itself will bid farewell to the human form. Power does not belong to human beings. Nor does it belong to fathers and sons.
This civilization will inevitably collapse. It will be a catastrophe unprecedented in human history, comparable only to the cataclysm of mythical Atlantis or the legendary Floods. One of the operational objectives of the Revolution is to ensure such an outcome, while simultaneously preventing any individual, organization, clan, family, or group not devoted to the Revolution from deriving advantage from it. This must be prevented at any cost, even if it should result in the failure of the Revolution itself.
The right to survive will belong only to involutionary humanoid derivatives, while the path for evolutionary offshoots will be opened toward other spheres of existence. Those who remain in human form in the future, or who descend into subhuman forms, are these involutionary derivatives, beings adapted to a lower mode of existence. That subhuman remnant will continue its existence upon the Earth. By contrast, those who ascend, the evolutionary offshoots, will abandon the human form and pass into realms that lie beyond the limits of our comprehension.
See related articles
NOTE:
Originally published in Serbian. This English version is an AI-assisted translation of the original text.
No comments:
Post a Comment