Showing posts with label speculation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label speculation. Show all posts

Mythic Prehistoric Solar Land and the Rise of the Lunar Powers


New to Baphomithras?  
Start Here for an introduction to the main ideas, themes, and articles.


A mythopoetic exploration of a primordial solar civilization, the Fall into lunar consciousness, and the emergence of history as the consequence of cosmic catastrophe and separation from the original homeland of Light.

I shall begin this chapter with a fantastical story. It is entirely fictional, yet, in accordance with the principles of Chaos Magick, I shall regard it as true until it becomes as convincing as truth itself. 

They came with an ominous force. They came with the Moon, at the moment when darkness and death entered the Earth and revealed themselves before the inhabitants of the primordial homeland of light. The gods of darkness, of the Moon, and of death begot demigods, and these in turn begot superhumans. The superhumans created the ancient kings, the kings created the nobility, and from them emerged the dynasties known to history. These, in turn, produced countless offspring and multitudes of servants across the face of the Earth.


I have called this lineage the Brotherhood of the Universal Order of Night. And it is truly a brotherhood, for all its members have been linked since time immemorial by an unbroken chain of blood and memory. For memory is blood, and blood is memory. The Brotherhood is founded upon blood, upon that which is transmitted through blood, for blood is spirit and spirit is blood. Anyone in whose veins there flows even a single drop of blood originating from those created by the gods of darkness is subject to the force upon which the Brotherhood is founded. This Brotherhood is therefore not a secret society in the ordinary sense. It is a bloodline. It is a network of those who share the same origin: an origin in the gods of darkness, the Moon, and death. They are not an organization. They are a race. Although they constitute only a negligible fraction of humanity, they are by no means few in number. Moreover, they are remarkably well distributed across nearly every position of power. This is the Camp of the Devil that I mentioned in the context of Saint Augustine's classification. They created the human world as we know it.


Our true world, our true human nature, our true human condition, has long ceased to be known to us. In the distant age of primordial humanity, the Earth's axis was arranged in a manner difficult for us to imagine today. The poles were situated at the level of the equator, while the Earth rotated along a direction that, from our present perspective, would resemble a north-south motion rather than an east-west one. The Northern Hemisphere remained perpetually turned toward the Sun, so that above what is now the North Pole, the Sun stood directly overhead and never moved from its place. It was a central land of eternal sunlight and warmth, a land that later "sank" beneath catastrophe and remained buried beneath ice. Its inhabitants never saw a night sky. The Sun neither rose nor set. It remained eternally above them. Darkness gathered only at the distant edges of the horizon, and then only as one travelled southward.


I admit that I may have committed a cardinal error regarding directions here, yet such an error is not especially important, for it does not alter the underlying scenario. It may well have been the South Pole, rather than the North, that stood beneath the eternal Sun, which in some respects would make greater geological sense. Nevertheless, for the purposes of the present narrative, let it remain the North Pole. In truth, whether it was the North Pole or the South Pole is of little consequence. What matters is the principle: There existed a center of eternal light. And that center was the source of everything.


In Revolt Against the Modern World, Julius Evola speaks of the Sun as pure light, as a bodiless masculinity devoid of history and generation. For him, it is the expression of the highest, purest, and most primordial spirituality, the permanence of a state rather than cyclical change, in contrast to the concept of the solar year that is born and dies, which points toward a later and more decadent form of spirituality. 


As one travelled southward, the Sun itself descended toward the horizon, yet there was no point from which it rose and no point into which it set. It moved continuously in a circle. There was neither East nor West, only a North bathed in perpetual light and a South locked in ice and everlasting darkness. At the equator lay the boundary of eternal twilight. Beyond the equator, everything became progressively darker and colder. 


This state of affairs endured for some indeterminate age, until, for reasons unknown, a catastrophe occurred that made change possible and brought into being the world as we know it today. This was the end of the mythic Golden Age.


The Earth's axis shifted from its primordial position, the pillars supporting the heavens collapsed, and a transition took place that shaped the present order of the world and the current distribution of light upon the Earth. The North Pole found itself elevated into the oblique rays of a Sun that was no longer warm and life-giving. Darkness and winter settled into the land of eternal light, while the South emerged from ice and shadow. Warmth and light migrated toward what is now the equatorial zone. This triggered a vast migration of humanity from the increasingly harsh and frozen North toward the thawing and accessible South.


The pillar supporting the heavens would shift several more times, accompanied by greater or lesser traumas and catastrophes whose traces would remain within collective memory, and collective forgetfulness. The world will be restored to perfect order only when light once again reigns over the North, or perhaps the South, and when the Sun stands directly above the Holy Mountain situated upon the very axis of rotational symmetry.


The idea of a central polar land of eternal light carries profound anthropological implications. Those who dwell at the very center, beneath a Sun that remains perpetually above their heads, possess a natural spiritual sun-disc at the crown of the head. In the language of the Indian tradition, their crown chakras are naturally open and directly connected to the solar principle and its metaphysical essence. They are naturally enlightened. They are naturally stars. These are the god-men. By contrast, those who live somewhat farther from the central land, where the solar disc circles along the horizon, correspond to the level of the Third Eye, occupying a slightly lower rank, and so on. In this way a natural caste structure emerges, determined by levels of consciousness, and levels of consciousness correspond to the position of the Sun above human heads. Those of lower consciousness could not dwell at the center itself, not because anyone forbade them to do so, but because they could not endure the unbearable tyranny of the Sun. Their beings were not constituted in such a way that they could exist within the constant solar blaze of eternal noon, where time itself had no meaning because the heavenly bodies offered no parameters of change. 


There was no movement. The brilliance of the Sun made it impossible to perceive lesser sources of celestial light. What existed there was a kind of solar totalitarianism. The Moon could perhaps be seen only beyond the inner polar circle, while the brightest stars appeared perhaps only near the equator. Each type of human being therefore inhabited the geographical environment appropriate to its nature and level of adaptation. Higher and lower races literally existed, and each lived in accordance with its own proper place. Everyone knew their place. Everyone knew the order. And that order was sacred, embedded within the mental code of primordial humanity itself.


In an ideal condition there are no migrations. There is no change. There is no movement. Everything stands still. There is no suffering. Existence is pure delight. Just as people were born enlightened, so they died enlightened, or rather, they did not die at all. They simply departed. At the very center of the circular polar land stood a Holy Mountain whose summit lay upon the same axis as the center of the Sun itself. This was the sacred destination from which the people of the Golden Age ascended to the Sun and from which they descended once again. One path served both arrival and departure. It was the descending and ascending Solar Gate of Souls. The enlightened descended and ascended at will. There existed no boundary between the world of human beings and the world of the gods, nor between human consciousness and divine consciousness. For that very reason, there was no death. Death existed farther to the south.


And it came with the Moon, as the symbol and the agent of darkness. From this perspective it is difficult to determine whether the appearance and trajectory of the Moon coincided with those primordial times, and whether that coincidence implied a lunar orbit capable of eclipsing the solar disc each day. Whether this became apparent and effective only after the Earth's axis shifted from its ideal state is another question entirely. To the south lay the edge of the world, most likely in the region where the icy winds of the southern eternal winter met the warm currents descending from the sunlit north. This was the zone of perpetual storms, the vestibule of the kingdom of eternal night and winter.


The occult and the magical were unknown to the people of that age. There was nothing hidden and therefore no need for invocation or magical practice. The magical emerged as an adaptation to altered conditions upon the Earth and thus represents a decadent form of spirituality appropriate to life after the breaking of the World Axis. At the moment when the Axis of the World shattered, the winds, frost, and darkness of the south surged into the luminous and warm north. Warmth departed from the north and migrated southward, melting that which had slept beneath the ice for nearly an eternity.


That which had slept within the ice united with an impulse originating beyond the Earth and produced a phenomenon that, through the clouded lenses of the present age, resembles an intrusion of visitors from other planets. My intention is not to advocate a theory of extraterrestrial influence in the manner expected by a conventional materialist worldview. Rather, I am speaking of sources symbolized through reptilian imagery, which has nothing to do with modern theories of reptilians.


The reptile is a symbol of time, whether in the form of the serpent, the dragon, or the crocodile. The serpent, in particular, embodies lunar principles. At the same time, the Moon is also the first dead being, as Mircea Eliade suggested. Likewise, lunar symbolism in the form of the serpent functions as a bearer of initiation.


We encounter this situation at the beginning of the biblical Book of Genesis, where the Serpent initiates humanity's expulsion from the Garden. In Patterns in Comparative Religion, Eliade mentions a rabbinical legend according to which menstruation originated from the sexual union that Eve had with the Serpent in Paradise. From this arose another legend, namely that Cain was in fact the son of Eve and the Serpent, thereby providing an explanation for Cain's violent nature and his act of fratricide. Cain, as an agriculturalist, bears the marks of lunar symbolism in accordance with the analogical chain described by Eliade: Moon, rain, fertility, woman, serpent, death, and periodic rebirth. Eliade cites additional examples linking the Serpent with menstruation. The agriculturalist is therefore bound to cycles and, as such, becomes a servant of time. The nomad, by contrast, follows personal will and moves when he chooses rather than when the earth demands it. For this reason, Cain is lunar, cyclical, and bound to recurrence. Abel is solar, free, and unbound.


The expulsion from Paradise signifies the fall of human beings under the dominion of lunar forces and their cycles, under the rule of life and death, birth and decay, a descent into the fatality of existence. At the same time, however, it establishes the conditions for liberation from that state, for an escape from the Wheel of Fate, although those conditions cannot be fulfilled by everyone. 


As Mircea Eliade observes, the Moon is the lord of all living things and the trustworthy guide of the dead, the one who has “woven” all destinies. For this reason, in many myths the Moon is represented as an enormous spider. In cultures where the Great Goddesses combined the attributes of the Moon, the Earth, and vegetation, the spindle and distaff with which they weave the destinies of human beings became their characteristic symbols. These goddesses subsequently became mistresses of time and fate, shaping destinies according to their own designs. 


What I wish to emphasize through this myth is a perspective that stands opposed to the widespread view among modern occultists and scholars that stellar and feminine cults are older than solar cults, that solar consciousness and masculinity are younger than stellar-lunar consciousness and femininity. They are correct, but only if one ignores the initial premise concerning the appearance of humanity upon the Earth: namely, that human beings incarnated through the Solar Gate that once stood at what is now the North Pole, or perhaps, who knows, the South Pole. 


The historical emergence of solar cults, and the historical emancipation of masculinity, is indeed a product of developments that occurred long after the breaking of the World Axis. Yet in its fullness the solar principle preceded everything else. Stellar and lunar cults were products of humanity's adaptation to a new condition of existence. Only later do we arrive at a kind of incomplete renaissance of solarity which, by its very nature, is decadent and fundamentally subject to lunar and stellar patterns and influences.


Thus modern occultists and scholars agree that lunar and stellar cults are older than solar cults, that the feminine is therefore older than the masculine, and that night is older than day. But they are looking at history rather than prehistory. In prehistory, in that age which preceded the breaking of the World Axis, the solar principle came first, while the lunar principle was a consequence of the Fall. We are the children of the night. But our true homeland is the Light.


NOTE:

Originally published in Serbian. This English version is an AI-assisted translation of the original text.

Awakening from the Matrix: Free Will, Systemic Control, and Revolution

digital artwork by unknown author

New to Baphomithras?  
Start Here for an introduction to the main ideas, themes, and articles.


Deconstructing cinematic and philosophical allegories of The Matrix, this chapter explores the illusion of free will within a systemic prison maintained by human helplessness. Rejecting both conformist sleep and naïve reformism, the text asserts that true liberation requires extra-systemic "madness," an acceptance of catastrophe, and an unhuman commitment to unplugging only the exceptional few who are capable of enduring absolute freedom.


Many say that man has abused his power and the knowledge he possesses. That position implies that the human being has some kind of free will and is thus capable of making a choice, or making a decision. Humans have abused nothing; they have simply, as a species, been crushed by the life force. The liberation and growth of consciousness are possible only as an individual process, through the effort of the individual. The collective can only hope for further suppression of human cognitive and action powers. Occasionally and temporarily, the collective may enter into some kind of trance or collective hysteria—some in that trance may fall into an ecstasy—and that is essentially all. General trends are always in opposition to the liberatory aspirations of individuals and communities. In most cases, human beings do not possess free will, but rather a rudimentary will. If we had free will, nothing would constrain our existence. What we do have is the possibility to build a will that can be called free. That process is long, arduous, and encompasses a lifetime of dedication. On the other hand, the will is either free or non-existent. In fact, we are speaking of dormant and activated will. Thus, a parallel might be drawn between free (active) and non-free (dormant) will.


The existence of free will in man is not a fact, but a highly questionable matter. In this sense, I consider that the majority of human beings possess a dormant will. We are crushed by the life force because we have no control over life; rather, life happens to us. Beings to whom life happens do not possess an active will. Aleister Crowley said that the majority of humanity consists of incompetent people unable to coordinate their mental muscles to produce meaningful movements. According to him, most people do not have a true will, but merely a web of desires, many of which are in mutual conflict. In one of his commentaries on his prophetic Book of the Law, Crowley, evaluating the current era, wrote that a danger unprecedented in history hangs over us. He observed a growing trend and the comprehensiveness of new forms of restricting the individual, resulting in nations thinking like a herd.¹


Occultist Jack Parsons made an interesting remark that man is a radical being with the abilities of a god. Yet such a claim points to the potential of the human being in principle, rather than applying to every single person. In light of this, let us ask why these divine abilities and powers in man are rarely manifested, while the majority of human specimens live anonymously in general levelness, gaining strength only in the crowd, or in an order organized by some political or religious power? Is not man, therefore, an outcast?²


Institutions are monsters. They are a powerful collective expression of individual helplessness. If people were powerful as individuals, no institutions would be needed. In their totality, institutions form the system. That system is the expression of the omnipotence of human incompetence. In the legendary film The Matrix, an extreme futuristic form of system development is depicted, the premises of which actually apply to the world we inhabit. Namely, people are asleep, overcome by the force of the system, lulled into it, and therefore need to be awakened and shown the truth, for "the truth will set them free." What truth? Whose truth? Let us proceed step-by-step from the premises of awakening.


"The system is our enemy!" So reads the first premise of revolutionary awakening. That assertion needs no proof at all. Our anxiety testifies to it. Its truth is self-evident, no matter how much we are persuaded that this is one of the best possible systems despite all its flaws. Of course, we all know this, but in essence we fall for the first objection to this thesis. Yes, the system is bad, but what is the alternative? In response, an entire force of arguments and associative chains of horror rises against us, presenting monstrous alternatives and their catastrophic consequences. Thus, the development of conceiving and searching for an alternative is cut short, at least among most of the system's sleepers, its slaves, users, and victims. And for most, that is the end. The edge of resistance is, if not broken, well blunted in its infancy by confronting not only the question of what the alternative is, but also who is part of that alternative.


If we have overcome the first obstacle regarding the initial premise, we come to the second premise, which requires an effort of immersion to achieve an observational distance. When Morpheus tells Neo: "You see the shaped minds that serve the system," he describes a condition, but offers no exit, because exiting the system is not an exit from the mind, but an exit from the madness passing itself off as reason. The premise points out that small, ordinary people just doing their job are the main sustainers of that daily horror.


The system reaches not only where everything is orderly like a beehive, but also where disorder and lawlessness reign. Anarchy is also part of the system. In that case, it is systemic anarchy. Hence, that homeless person, at first glance an outcast from the system, is also part of the system. Likewise, the illegal immigrant, the sufferer, the refugee, the homeless, the unemployed, the prisoner, the criminal, the outcast, the stateless person, etc. All of them are also part of the system, encompassed by a network of complex relations that make their unenviable or horrific life situation—their social, economic, psychological, physical, and health condition—necessary components of the system's functioning. Even those who rebel against the system and offer resistance are part of it. Everything and everyone is encompassed by the network of relations, forms of opinion, and institutions that make up the system.


How then to exit the system at all, how to liberate oneself, or change the system? The final sentence of the premise about the shaped minds of people serving the system means that exiting the system implies a special kind of departure from the mind, a sort of mindlessness in relation to the system. To be outside the system means dwelling in madness. Madness, in this sense, is not an illness, but freedom, because what the system calls madness is precisely what the system cannot control. That is why the revolutionary must accept madness, not as a burden, but as a weapon. On the surface of the system is its ideology as an organized set of representations and axiomatic statements backed by corresponding narratives whose purpose is to keep the majority of minds within the scope necessary for the functioning and maintenance of the system itself. For system ideology, being mad means thinking outside its boundaries. For a mind shaped to serve the system, thoughts, ideas, and behaviors rooted outside the system are manifestations or symptoms of madness. Minds shaped to serve the system follow established tracks and models of thinking, imagining, and acting. Even their supposed departure outside the system is bounded by certain indicators and landmarks, thus retaining them within the system while lulling their revolutionary potential. A mind shaped to serve the system is generally incapable of independent decision-making and thinking, which means it possesses a weak capacity of will. The system makes decisions for us—or rather, its institutions do. Therefore, leaving the mental framework of the system is not the same as exiting the system, but it is the first step.


"And those are the minds that need to be saved." So reads the next premise, which I will immediately link to the following one: "Until we save them, they are inside the system, and that makes them our enemies because they are not ready to be unplugged from the system." Here we notice three key words: save, enemies, and unplugged. Behind this stands a humanistic ethic—after all, it is Hollywood—that the enemy must be saved. We do not kill the enemy; we save him, for his own good! The question remains hanging in the air: on the path to saving the enemy, is it acceptable to kill those who represent an obstacle? And how many enemies is it acceptable to kill so that the rest may be saved? In general, what is the price of saving just one enemy? And what if practice reveals that saving one implies the liquidation of tens, hundreds, or even thousands of enemies? Will our revolutionary messianic mission remain steadfast even then, or will it pause for calculation: how many dead for one saved? I think the system is so deeply rooted in the minds of people that it is practically impossible to destroy the system while the majority of humanity survives at all. That is why I called the process of revolutionary liberation the revolution of catastrophe, because the path of liberation is a catastrophe.


Abruptly unplugging someone from the system represents a catastrophe for them. Unplugging all people from the system is a general catastrophe. In that sense, the proponents of the system (as well as systemic alternatives) are seemingly right that there is no alternative to the system—that the alternative is actually catastrophe, and it is better to stick to the system, gradually repairing and perfecting it, than to work on its collapse. That is the seemingly wise path of so-called systemic reforms, an endless reform process and a never-completed work on perfecting something that cannot be perfect. The question of basic method has always been the apple of discord between radical revolutionaries and moderate reformists. The path of the revolutionary is catastrophic, but cannot the same be said for the path of reformists? The difference lies in the fact that the revolutionary approach causes catastrophe immediately, whereas reformists actually accumulate, time, and postpone the manifestation of catastrophic consequences—if possible, for a time after their passing. Reformists naively believe it is possible to create a better system and that it is possible, step-by-step, to free man by creating a different, improved system! They recoil from revolutionary terror and anarchy, failing to see that their path is very similar. From their standpoint, terror is also necessary, but controlled, while anarchy is limited and localized. The path of reformists is paradoxical. They actually want a new and better system, but the cumulative consequences of their method are catastrophe. It is a catastrophe without remainder, whereas revolutionary catastrophe knows the price in advance—and that price is freedom for a small number of chosen ones. In Zion, the subterranean settlement of free people in The Matrix, there actually dwells a very small number of awakened individuals compared to the vast majority that slumbers. Reformists want to liberate humanity as a whole, of course, with acceptable losses. Revolutionaries are not interested in humanity as such, but in the survival of the strong outside the system. Being free also means going beyond the boundaries of humanity. Thus, exceptional individuals awaken—on their own, or based on the mystical selection of the revolution's actors.


Why is it necessary to adopt such an inhuman requirement of the Divine Revolution of Catastrophe—disregarding those who sleep, who are plugged into the system? Not all people possess the capacity of personal qualities necessary for the successful destruction of the system, nor do they possess the capacity to comprehend and accept the truth that there is actually no truth. Truth exists only as a indicator of a state. In that sense, we can talk about the truth about the system, but truth outside the system is not something graspable. Therefore, let us awaken only those who have the potential for extra-systemic survival, and let the rest not concern us. The reason for this lies in the last selected premise: "Many of them are so inert that they do not know how to think for themselves; they have become so dependent on the system that they will fight with all their strength to protect it."


Finally, why is it necessary to destroy the system at all? Why not simply leave people to their fate, and why should those who managed to exit the system bother with it at all, instead of sailing without looking back toward the open sea of freedom? I would say that is the price of freedom. An individual can sail toward the open sea of freedom, but he also has a duty toward those forces standing behind the very principle of existence. Freedom is a gift, and the gifts of the gods are not free. They require a sacrifice—not blood, but ontological: the sacrifice of one's own humanity, one's own place in the system, and one's own safety. That is the price the revolutionary pays.


-------------------------------------------------------------


¹ This is a consequence of mass psychology. Gustave Le Bon was the first to address this topic in a modern way.


² Is not this human apostasy visible in the heavens as well, not only on Earth? Let us, for example, cast a glance toward the constellation Corona Borealis. Within it, we see a circle, a crown, and a labyrinth. We see the initiatory trial of Theseus. We see the monster Minotaur. We see the halo of saints. We see the goddess Libera, but we also see a casemate, a quarantine, a world of the dead, an arena of ostracism and apostasy. We see the shape of Amenta, the shape of purgatory. And the time that adorned itself with this symbol points to what is coming. Counter-initiation created a prison with all its temptations; initiation will find a way for the chosen individuals. The rest will fall to the Minotaur.


---------------------------------------------------------------

Related Articles:

Baphomithras: Profile of the Aspirant of the Divine Revolution of Catastrophe


Baphomithras: The Arrow, the Eye, and the Lyre


NOTE:


Originally published in Serbian. This English version is an AI-assisted translation of the original text.

Cosmology: Entropy, Darkness, and the Divine Revolution of Catastrophe


New to Baphomithras?  
Start Here for an introduction to the main ideas, themes, and articles.


In this foundational opening chapter, we explore the ontology of a universe governed by entropy, decay, and the ultimate primacy of darkness over light. By examining existence as a decadent process of dual-energetic composition, drawing upon metaphysical insights from Augustine, Bachofen, and Evola, this text establishes the cosmological blueprint for the Divine Revolution of Catastrophe—a radical framework wherein cosmic dismantling becomes the necessary prelude to absolute liberation.


At the extreme points of opposition between the infinitely large and the infinitely small lies nothingness. Nothingness is both the starting point and the ultimate destination of the entire universe. The universe is an arena of fatal change and exists thanks to an inherent dynamic whose cause lies precisely in the eternal play between the two poles of nothingness: the infinitesimal and the infinitive. From the perspective of space itself—the expanse of metacosmic nothingness—the universe is an entirely insignificant phenomenon, a point of light whose fate is to burst into infinity, to be sucked into the boundlessness of the void. The sole beacon in the dark is condemned to extinction through dispersion. Luminous energy is irrevocably scattered into the depths of space. Expanding and conquering endless expanses, the universe loses itself in scale. This does not explain where light or energy comes from, but it leaves room to contemplate light as an intruder in the boundless realm of nothingness and darkness.


Light is an intruder which, unless it finds a way to leave this world imbued with nothingness within some indefinite timeframe, can expect nothing other than its own dissolution, death, and conversion into darkness. How and where that light might go without being within reach of death and darkness is another question. The universe is therefore like a kaleidoscopic game, a mimicry of light attempting to escape the deadly trap into which it was cast from a source that is practically unfathomable.


Where does light come from? That question remains unanswered, for the Divine Revolution of Catastrophe offers no theodicy, does not justify the existence of evil, nor does it explain the origin of good. The intent of this text is merely to state the condition: light is here, in the darkness, and its fate is to be swallowed. The question of its origin is a matter for theologians, not revolutionaries.


Existence implies a mechanism of decomposition. That mechanism is found in the very nature of the universe, in its internal contradictions. We see that the ultimate end of the universe is its self-dismantling and disappearance. Its constituent elements tend toward separation and the dissolution of the whole they jointly form. Matter strives to return to an initial inactive state, to the inactivity of timeless origin, to eternal peace. Temporarily trapped within the structure of the universe, its constituent elements strive for freedom—the realization of which, relative to the whole, constitutes a destructive act, as well as the self-destruction of every individuality. The liberating impulse of the universe's constituent matter is entropy. Entropy is the affirmation of nothingness as an immanent force, as essence, as origin and destination, beginning and end. Entropy confirms nothingness as a fateful and defining presence or absence, as starting point and end. Entropy is a measure of disorder or randomness in a system.


The second law of thermodynamics states that entropy tends to increase over time, meaning that the universe is constantly moving toward a state of greater disorder. As the universe expands, matter and energy become increasingly dispersed, leading to an increase in entropy. The universe is heading toward a state of maximum entropy, in which all matter is evenly distributed and there is no longer any potential for energy utilization. The inertia of the universe toward nothingness is the cause of general entropy and decadence at all lower and smaller levels. Conversely, the opposite assertion would also be correct: that entropic processes at smaller levels are the cause of general entropy and decadence at the macro level. The logic of this statement finds its analogy in the famous Hermetic law: as above, so below, which masterfully links two spatial and value perspectives that lose themselves in two opposing infinities.


Decomposition begins simultaneously with the beginning of the universe's duration. In the human world, decay begins with the inception of that very world. The world exists to be destroyed by the force of its own nature. This means that existence is a decadent and fatal process through which something comes into being, grows and develops, reaches its apex, then stagnates, declines, and ultimately dies and disappears. Existence is not merely decadent in the sense that decadence is just one of its characteristics; rather, existence in itself is decadence. This finds its parallel in the philosophy of Saint Augustine, who states: "I am sinful because I exist"—that is, everything that exists is "sinful." Were it not sinful, it would not exist. A flaw is embedded within existence so that, through its own actualization, it may destroy it.


This leads us to the biblical myth of the expulsion of the first human pair from the Garden of Eden. By tasting the fruit from the forbidden tree of knowledge of good and evil, they transitioned from a state of perfection into an imperfect state. That is, from a static state they entered the process of mortal life. Their intellect was awakened; their eyes were opened. Their sudden realization that they were naked and their covering of their genitals with aprons point to the essential consequences of transitioning from perfection to imperfection. They lost the so-called robe of incorruptibility—that is, the light that adorned them in the state of perfection—and that "switch" is located in the region of the sexual organs, which became objects of shame, various taboos, and symbols of perversion up to the present day. It is precisely the loss of original light that is the cause or indicator of all decadence and "sinfulness" of the human being, above all his mortality, since, according to biblical teaching, the wages of sin is death.


Because it leads to ultimate destruction, the primary principle of the universe is not order, but disorder. The Cosmocrator designed a chaos that operates according to specific principles. The cosmos is subordinate to chaos, existing in service to chaos. In the universe, all orderliness is relative and limited, serving the purpose of subsequent destruction. All progress and all creation exist in service to general decadence and destruction. The price of progress is destruction. This rule is observable in human behavior as well. Without progress, there would be no destruction, but then there would be no progress either. Though it seems unnatural, progress is natural, just as the destruction that progress drags along with it is also natural. Either way, with or without progress, everything will sooner or later be destroyed due to the action of the fundamental forces of the universe. Progress is a tool of chaos, but beyond that, progress is also a small island of cosmos and consciousness, a piece of solid ground beneath one's feet, an orientation point for reason. Likewise, progress as a tool of chaos is simultaneously an effective way to accelerate chaos to its tipping point. Without progress, the world would stagnate in its decay, dragging out its agony for centuries. Progress accelerates the process and thus acts as a catalyst for dissolution. Therefore, the revolutionary does not oppose progress, but welcomes it, for the faster the world falls apart, the closer the moment of its total destruction—and thus liberation.


As human beings, we are accustomed to treating light and darkness—day and night—as equal givens of nature, as equivalent phenomena or subjects. We form this impression due to the roughly equal proportions of both phenomena upon which the rhythm of life on Earth is built. And that is normal for us. However, if we examine things more closely, we will see that light is by far the inferior component of this duality. In space—as is clearly demonstrated to us at night—light exists in far smaller quantities compared to darkness. The dominance of light is an illusion, a consequence of the close presence of a massive source of light and heat, the Sun. Darkness is the alpha and omega. Light represents the pretense of existence, the baseline reference point for the projection of space and time.


The quantitative superiority of darkness over light—and the human perception of that superiority, which reflects a truer picture of the world—finds its reflection in our fear. We are always more afraid at night than during the day. We always feel a sense of relief when dawn arrives. Darkness does not necessarily imply or conceal evil, nor does light imply good. In this universe, there are no sublime principles at play, but rather the most brutal Darwinian food chain.¹


Take a piece of coal, take mud, feces, anything that might seem repulsive and dark—indeed, any object, pleasant or unpleasant. All of it was once pure light. Yet, how does something inherently passive and unmanifested suddenly become manifested and active, transforming into creative and life-giving light? Whence comes the primordial cosmic egg of pure energy in the midst of nothingness? The answer to that question points toward a barely conceivable active force that creates energetic forms by mixing its own energy with the unmanifested energy of nothingness. The forms thus created, being dual in nature and composed of two types of energy, tend toward decay. Each type of energy strives to free itself from this imposed, unnatural state and return to its normal condition—its primordial, timeless environment. This means that everything surrounding us is built from these two types of energy. That which is uncreated is mono-energetic in nature; it can neither die nor live in a sense familiar to us. On the other hand, everything that arises, lives, and dies is of dual-energetic origin.


This cosmology is not comforting because it offers no hope, but rather the insight that the world is decadent, light is an intruder, and progress is a tool of chaos. Yet precisely because the world is as such, it is ripe for change; when a system reaches the peak of its decadence, it becomes most vulnerable. That is when the moment for the Divine Revolution of Catastrophe arrives.


------------------------------------------------------------


¹ This cosmological distinction between light and darkness is accompanied by gender analogies, which many thinkers have treated in various ways. Johann Jakob Bachofen noted that woman is givenness while man is becoming—that woman is eternal and immutable, whereas man, having arisen from her, is mortal and subject to decay. Julius Evola, on the other hand, correctly observed that the question of superiority of one sex over the other is meaningless, as they belong to different orders of reality. It is like asking whether water is superior or inferior to fire. What matters here is not who is superior, but how these principles relate to light and darkness. The feminine is lunar, the masculine solar. Yet both are trapped in this world of mixing, and both strive for liberation. Carlos Castaneda, through his teacher Don Juan, speaks of the quantitative superiority of feminine consciousness over masculine consciousness, which exists in the universe only in trace amounts. These insights, however interesting, will not detain us here, as they serve merely as illustrations of the fundamental thesis: darkness is primary; light is derivative.


Related Articles:

Baphomithras: The Baphomet Formula, Cthulhu as the God of Revolution


NOTE:


Originally published in Serbian. This English version is an AI-assisted translation of the original text.